Pengumuman ~ Announcements

~ SELAMAT DATANG AHLI-AHLI BARU KKS ~ JAYAKAN BERSAMA KEMPEN 1 AHLI BERDAFTAR 5 AHLI BARU ~ Pada 15.05.2010 laman Facebook Komuniti Kadayan Sejagat kini telah mencapai keahlian 4,000 orang ~ http://komunitikadayansejagat.blogspot.com/ ~

Saturday, May 15, 2010

7 Things to Stop Doing Now on Facebook

by Consumer Reports Magazine
Wednesday, May 12, 2010











Using a Weak Password

Avoid simple names or words you can find in a dictionary, even with numbers tacked on the end. Instead, mix upper- and lower-case letters, numbers, and symbols. A password should have at least eight characters. One good technique is to insert numbers or symbols in the middle of a word, such as this variant on the word "houses": hO27usEs!

Leaving Your Full Birth Date in Your Profile

It's an ideal target for identity thieves, who could use it to obtain more information about you and potentially gain access to your bank or credit card account. If you've already entered a birth date, go to your profile page and click on the Info tab, then on Edit Information. Under the Basic Information section, choose to show only the month and day or no birthday at all.

Overlooking Useful Privacy Controls

For almost everything in your Facebook profile, you can limit access to only your friends, friends of friends, or yourself. Restrict access to photos, birth date, religious views, and family information, among other things. You can give only certain people or groups access to items such as photos, or block particular people from seeing them. Consider leaving out contact info, such as phone number and address, since you probably don't want anyone to have access to that information anyway.

Posting Your Child's Name in a Caption

Don't use a child's name in photo tags or captions. If someone else does, delete it by clicking on Remove Tag. If your child isn't on Facebook and someone includes his or her name in a caption, ask that person to remove the name.
Mentioning That You'll Be Away From Home
That's like putting a "no one's home" sign on your door. Wait until you get home to tell everyone how awesome your vacation was and be vague about the date of any trip.

Letting Search Engines Find You

To help prevent strangers from accessing your page, go to the Search section of Facebook's privacy controls and select Only Friends for Facebook search results. Be sure the box for public search results isn't checked.

Permitting Youngsters to Use Facebook Unsupervised

Facebook limits its members to ages 13 and over, but children younger than that do use it. If you have a young child or teenager on Facebook, the best way to provide oversight is to become one of their online friends. Use your e-mail address as the contact for their account so that you receive their notifications and monitor their activities. "What they think is nothing can actually be pretty serious," says Charles Pavelites, a supervisory special agent at the Internet Crime Complaint Center. For example, a child who posts the comment "Mom will be home soon, I need to do the dishes" every day at the same time is revealing too much about the parents' regular comings and goings.

Source : Please click here.

Friday, May 7, 2010

Facebook glitch exposes chat messages

Thursday May 6, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO: Facebook on Wednesday temporarily shut down its online chat feature after a software glitch let people’s friends in the online community see each others’ private chat messages.

For a “limited period of time” chat messages and pending friend requests could be made visible to friends, according to Facebook.

For peeks at the usually walled-off information Facebook users had to manipulate a “preview my profile” feature in a particular way, according to Facebook.

“When we received reports of the problem, our engineers promptly diagnosed it and temporarily disabled the chat function,” a Facebook spokesman said in an email response to an AFP inquiry.

“We also pushed out a fix to take care of the visible friend requests.”

Chat was back in action for most Facebook users by 1900 GMT and it was expected to be working across the website “shortly.”

“We worked quickly to resolve this matter, ensuring that once the bug was reported to us, a solution was quickly found and implemented,” the Facebook spokesman said. Crosshairs on Facebook

The software glitch struck as the world’s top online social-networking service is increasingly scrutinised regarding the privacy of members.

Slightly more than half of adult users of social networks have posted “risky personal information” such as birth dates or children’s photos to profile pages, according to a Consumer Reports survey titled Social Insecurity.

The survey indicated that 23% of Facebook’s users “either didn’t know that the site offered privacy controls or chose not to use them.”

Last week, four US senators expressed concern to Facebook over recent changes to the social network that they say compromises the privacy of its more than 400 million users.

In a letter to Facebook co-founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg, the senators said they were concerned that personal information about Facebook users is being made available to third party websites.

They also said the Palo Alto, California-based Facebook should make sharing personal information an “opt-in” procedure in which a user specifically gives permission for data to be shared.

The letter was signed by Democratic senators Charles Schumer of New York, Al Franken of Minnesota, Michael Bennet of Colorado and Mark Begich of Alaska.

Senator Schumer has urged the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to look into the privacy practices of Facebook, MySpace, Twitter and other social networking sites and to issue guidelines on the use of private information.

Privacy still paramount

Facebook on April 21 rolled out a series of new features including the ability for partner websites to incorporate Facebook data, a move that would further expand the social network’s presence on the Internet.

Facebook vice-president of global communications, marketing and public policy Elliot Schrage has been adamant that online privacy is taken very seriously at the company.

“These new products and features are designed to enhance personalisation and promote social activity across the Internet while continuing to give users unprecedented control over what information they share, when they want to share it, and with whom,” Schrage said. — AFP/Relaxnews

Source: Please click here.

POLISI KERAHSIAAN MAKLUMAT PERIBADI DI FACEBOOK SEMAKIN LONGGAR

Berikut saya paparkan maklumat penting berkaitan polisi kerahsiaan maklumat-maklumat peribadi di facebook yang dikatakan kian longgar. Sehubungan dengan itu saya ingin mengambil kesempatan ini untuk mengingatkan paadian-paadian samuha supaya berhati-hati apabila memberi maklumat-maklumat peribadi yang diperlukan semasa pendaftaran keahlian facebook. Salam hormat.

Facebook's Eroding Privacy Policy: A Timeline

Commentary by Kurt Opsahl

Since its incorporation just over five years ago, Facebook has undergone a remarkable transformation. When it started, it was a private space for communication with a group of your choice. Soon, it transformed into a platform where much of your information is public by default. Today, it has become a platform where you have no choice but to make certain information public, and this public information may be shared by Facebook with its partner websites and used to target ads.

To help illustrate Facebook's shift away from privacy, we have highlighted some excerpts from Facebook's privacy policies over the years. Watch closely as your privacy disappears, one small change at a time!

Facebook Privacy Policy circa 2005:

No personal information that you submit to Thefacebook will be available to any user of the Web Site who does not belong to at least one of the groups specified by you in your privacy settings.

Facebook Privacy Policy circa 2006:

We understand you may not want everyone in the world to have the information you share on Facebook; that is why we give you control of your information. Our default privacy settings limit the information displayed in your profile to your school, your specified local area, and other reasonable community limitations that we tell you about.

Facebook Privacy Policy circa 2007:

Profile information you submit to Facebook will be available to users of Facebook who belong to at least one of the networks you allow to access the information through your privacy settings (e.g., school, geography, friends of friends). Your name, school name, and profile picture thumbnail will be available in search results across the Facebook network unless you alter your privacy settings.

Facebook Privacy Policy circa November 2009:

Facebook is designed to make it easy for you to share your information with anyone you want. You decide how much information you feel comfortable sharing on Facebook and you control how it is distributed through your privacy settings. You should review the default privacy settings and change them if necessary to reflect your preferences. You should also consider your settings whenever you share information. ...

Information set to “everyone” is publicly available information, may be accessed by everyone on the Internet (including people not logged into Facebook), is subject to indexing by third party search engines, may be associated with you outside of Facebook (such as when you visit other sites on the internet), and may be imported and exported by us and others without privacy limitations. The default privacy setting for certain types of information you post on Facebook is set to “everyone.” You can review and change the default settings in your privacy settings.

Facebook Privacy Policy circa December 2009:

Certain categories of information such as your name, profile photo, list of friends and pages you are a fan of, gender, geographic region, and networks you belong to are considered publicly available to everyone, including Facebook-enhanced applications, and therefore do not have privacy settings. You can, however, limit the ability of others to find this information through search using your search privacy settings.

Current Facebook Privacy Policy, as of April 2010:

When you connect with an application or website it will have access to General Information about you. The term General Information includes your and your friends’ names, profile pictures, gender, user IDs, connections, and any content shared using the Everyone privacy setting. ... The default privacy setting for certain types of information you post on Facebook is set to “everyone.” ... Because it takes two to connect, your privacy settings only control who can see the connection on your profile page. If you are uncomfortable with the connection being publicly available, you should consider removing (or not making) the connection.

Viewed together, the successive policies tell a clear story. Facebook originally earned its core base of users by offering them simple and powerful controls over their personal information. As Facebook grew larger and became more important, it could have chosen to maintain or improve those controls. Instead, it's slowly but surely helped itself — and its advertising and business partners — to more and more of its users' information, while limiting the users' options to control their own information.

Source : Please click here.

Sunday, May 2, 2010

Parlimen jadi pameran gusti

Oleh HAFIZAHRIL HAMID


POLITIK adalah seni untuk segala kemungkinan. Dan kerana itulah manusia sanggup melakukan apa saja hingga menghalalkan cara demi mencapai matlamat yang diidamkan. Itu yang sering dinyatakan oleh ahli falsafah dan ahli sains politik Barat mengenai politik.

Walaupun dari sudut yang lebih jelas politik adalah satu disiplin penting tentang bagaimana untuk membangunkan sebuah negara yang ideal namun akibat tindakan pelaku-pelaku politik menyebabkan politik sering dianggap sesuatu yang kotor dan jijik.

Dari segi maksud yang sering dianggap terbaik, politik adalah proses dan cara membuat keputusan oleh sesuatu kumpulan. Maksud ini biasanya digunakan bagi merujuk kepada tindakan kerajaan melakukan apa yang terbaik untuk negara dan masyarakat. Ia turut melibatkan tingkah laku politik selain membabitkan pihak korporat, ahli akademik, agama, dan pelbagai institusi lain.

Itu dari segi idealnya. Bagaimanapun apabila manusia mentafsirkan politik dari sudut kepentingan dan pengalaman peribadinya maka terhasillah kata-kata seperti yang diungkapkan Lenin iaitu politik ialah siapa yang boleh lakukan apa kepada siapa (Who could do what to whom ). Atau pun seperti yang dinyatakan seorang ahli sains politik, Harold Lasswell, politik adalah siapa yang dapat apa, bila dan bagaimana (who gets what, when and how ). Secara umumnya semua maksud yang dinyatakan ada kebenarannya tetapi untuk menjadikan ia sebagai paling ideal adalah kurang tepat serta jauh sekali dari kebenaran. Ini kerana soal yang paling menjadi tumpuan dalam politik pastinya membabitkan kuasa. Apabila seseorang atau sesuatu kumpulan itu mendapat kuasa maka siapa yang gagal mengawalnya akan turut terbuai dengan sifat dan kelakuan akibat gagal mengawal kekuasaan. Maka kerana itulah manusia menjadi gila akibat politik dan kerana kegilaan jugalah semua perkara diluar batasan akal sanggup dilakukan.

Inilah yang berlaku di Ukraine baru-baru ini apabila kegilaan berpolitik mengakibatkan suasana Parlimen negara itu bertukar seolah-olah berada di zoo. Parlimen Ukraine menjadi kecoh pada Selasa lepas apabila anggotanya bertindak bergaduh dan melontar bom asap ketika perbahasan hangat mengenai tempoh melanjutkan kehadiran sebuah pangkalan tentera laut Rusia di negara itu.

Rusia sebelum ini bersetuju untuk memberikan Ukraine diskaun sebanyak 30 peratus ke atas gas asli yang diimportnya bernilai AS$40 bilion (RM128.8 bilion) bagi tempoh 10 tahun jika Ukraine melanjutkan tempoh kehadiran pangkalan tenteranya di Ukraine.

Tindakan ini dilihat oleh pembangkang yang pro-Barat sebagai satu langkah mencemarkan kedaulatan negara itu. Kekecohan bermula apabila Speaker, Volodymr Lytvyn dibaling sedozen telur memaksa beliau berlindung di sebalik payung.

Pergaduhan

Beberapa bom asap juga dilontar di dalam dewan, dipercayai dilakukan oleh wakil rakyat pembangkang pro-Barat sebelum tercetus pergaduhan apabila anggota-anggota Parlimen saling tumbuk-menumbuk. Andriy Shevchenko, ahli Parlimen daripada blok yang diketuai bekas Perdana Menteri, Yulia Tymoshenko, mengaku bom asap berkenaan dilontar oleh pihaknya.

Pihak pembangkang turut mengungkit kekejaman Rusia yang pernah mengakibatkan kebuluran melampau atau dipanggil Holodomor pada tahun 1932-1933. Kejadian tersebut dikatakan dilakukan oleh pemerintah Rusia ketika itu, Josef Stalin sebagai usaha untuk mengendurkan semangat nasionalisme rakyat Ukraine yang dibimbangi boleh mencetus semangat untuk mendapatkan kemerdekaan. Kekejaman tersebut dikatakan telah mengakibatkan kematian antara tiga hingga 10 juta orang dan pihak pembangkang percaya ia dilancarkan sebagai usaha penghapusan etnik. Namun bagi pihak Rusia kejadian tersebut berlaku akibat dari kegagalan pembaharuan ekonomi yang dilakukan Stalin selain kemelut ekonomi yang teruk ketika itu.

Bagaimana Presiden Ukraine yang Pro-Rusia Viktor Yanukovych, tidak bersetuju dengan kenyataan itu dan beranggapan kejadian Holodomor itu bukan ditujukan kepada etnik-etnik tertentu tetapi berlaku kepada semua mangsa yang terlibat.

Kekecohan yang berlaku itu benar-benar memalukan imej negara itu dan turut dianggap sejarah hitam dalam politik Ukraine walaupun ia bukan pertama kali berlaku di dunia. Peristiwa pergaduhan ketika sidang Parlimen adalah sesuatu yang biasa berlaku di Taiwan dan Korea Selatan. Malah tidak ada apa yang menghairankan jika pergaduhan meletus ketika sidang Parlimen di kedua negara itu kerana ia seolah-oleh sudah menjadi perkara biasa walaupun ia dilihat mencemarkan perjalanan proses demokrasi.

Bagaimana walaupun keadaan kecoh di Parlimen Ukraine, masih terdapat ahli Parlimen meneruskan ucapan seolah-olah tidak ada apa-apa yang berlaku.

"Tidak kira lontar bom asap atau baling telur ataupun bergaduh, ia tidak mampu menidakkan pihak majoriti membuat keputusan," kata Perdana Menteri, Mykola Azarov selepas sesi tamat.

Namun di sebalik kejadian luar biasa yang menyaksikan dewan persidangan dipenuhi asap, Parlimen meluluskan usul untuk melanjutkan tempoh armada Laut Hitam Rusia di Crimea sehingga 2042, yang disifatkan oleh pembangkang sebagai 'menggadai' Ukraine. Dengan sebahagian ahli Parlimen memekik 'malu', Parlimen meluluskan usul berkenaan dengan 236 daripada 450 anggota Parlimen mengundi menyokong usul tersebut.

Kejadian sebegini pastinya tidak boleh dielakkan apabila manusia terlalu obses dengan berpolitik kerana cuba mempertahankan kebenaran yang entah betul atau tidak. Akhirnya situasi sidang Parlimen yang sepatutnya menjadi landasan untuk wakil rakyat yang dipilih oleh masyarakat untuk menjadi suara mereka dalam soal-soal penting seperti pendidikan, pembangunan dan sebagainya tidak ubah seperti zoo. Apa lagi yang tinggal untuk dijadikan contoh kepada rakyat jika wakil mereka sendiri bertindak seperti orang yang tidak bertamadun.

Lebih menyedihkan kelihatannya kedua-dua pihak saling mempertikaikan kebenaran yang bukan lagi menjadi hak eksklusif mereka kerana saling berpihak kepada 'tuan" yang tidak sepatutnya. Pembangkang berpihak kepada Barat manakala parti pemerintah menjadi tali barut kepada Rusia. Memang menyedihkan apabila sistem demokrasi yang sering dibanggakan sebagai landasan terbaik untuk manusia berpolitik disalah guna untuk menjadi tali barut kepada pihak tertentu.

Ironinya kedua-dua pihak sama ada pembangkang mahupun parti memerintah mendakwa mereka adalah pihak yang mahu mendokong kedaulatan negara dan memastikan segala tindak-tanduk yang dilakukan adalah untuk kepentingan negara. Tetapi apa lagi makna yang tinggal jika sudah terang mereka mendakwa berpihak kepada kuasa-kuasa tertentu. Parti pemerintah yang pro-Rusia cuba mempertahankan tempoh melanjutkan kehadiran sebuah pangkalan tentera laut Rusia di negara itu. Manakala pihak pembangkang yang pro-Barat pula menentang hegemoni Rusia di negara tersebut. Maka sudah terang lagi bersuluh apa ertinya kedaulatan jika pemimpin yang sepatutnya lebih mendahulukan kepentingan negara terlalu terpengaruh dengan kehendak kuasa asing.

Oleh itu pergaduhan yang berlaku di Parlimen itu hanyalah lebih kepada peristiwa yang memalukan bagi penduduk Ukraine yang sudahpun hilang kedaulatannya akibat terlalu terikut dengan kehendak kuasa asing. Yang pasti pihak asing yang begitu bersungguh-sungguh cuba mencampuri urusan negara itu hanya akan ketawa dan bertepuk tangan kerana berjaya menjadikan negara itu huru-hara akibat kebodohan pemimpin Ukraine sendiri. Yang menjadi mangsa dan korban adalah penduduknya yang masih dahagakan pembangunan dan keamanan. Apa lagi yang tinggal jika kedaulatan yang begitu menjadi sandaran sesebuah negara akhirnya terkulai di tangan pihak asing yang cuma mahu memuaskan tembolok mereka sendiri.

Sumber : Sila klik disini.

Saturday, May 1, 2010

How Different Countries Debate in Parliaments / Congress






India














Italy














Japan

















Mexico














Russia















South Korea

















Taiwan














Turkey














Ukraine













China - See what happens during political meetings in People's Republic of China ...
Peaceful, Harmonious and No disturbance.